Cigpapers Blog Mailshots British Supreme Court Judges

Written by Cigpapers Additional Material by Watt Tyler

For historical reasons, as a state made up of several separate jurisdictions, the United Kingdom does not have a single unified legal system.

Instead, there is one system for England and Wales, another for Scotland, and a third for Northern Ireland.

In most cases, The Supreme Court sits above all of these as the final court of appeal.

Role of The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, as well as being the final court of appeal, plays an important role in the development of United Kingdom law.

As an appeal court, The Supreme Court cannot consider a case unless a relevant order has been made in a lower court.

The Supreme Court:

  • is the final court of appeal for all United Kingdom civil cases, and criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland
  • hears appeals on arguable points of law of general public importance
  • concentrates on cases of the greatest public and constitutional importance
  • maintains and develops the role of the highest court in the United Kingdom as a leader in the common law world

The Supreme Court hears appeals from the following courts in each jurisdiction: England and Wales

  • The Court of Appeal, Civil Division
  • The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
  • (in some limited cases) the High Court

Scotland

  • The Court of Session

The twelve most senior Judges at the Supreme Court are an odd assortment of jews, freemasons, paedophiles and cultural-marxists. Here are their official biographies:

Lord Neuberger

Lord Neuberger

 

President of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury

Lord Neuberger becomes the second President of the Supreme Court since it was opened by Her Majesty the Queen in October 2009 to replace the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. He previously held the post of Master of the Rolls from 1 October 2009.

Born on 10 January 1948, Lord Neuberger was educated at Westminster School, later studied Chemistry at Christ Church, Oxford. After graduating he worked at the merchant bank, N M Rothschild & Sons from 1970-1973 until he entered Lincoln’s Inn and was called to the Bar in 1974.

Lord Neuberger was made a Queen’s Counsel (QC) in 1987 and became a Bencher for Lincoln’s Inn in 1993. His first judicial appointment was as a Recorder from 1990 until 1996 when he was appointed a High Court judge in the Chancery Division and was then the Supervisory Chancery Judge for the Midland, Wales and Chester and Western Circuits 2000 – 2004.

In 1999 Lord Neuberger chaired the Advisory Committee on the Spoliation of Art (in the Holocaust). Since 2000 he has been a governor of the University of Arts London and in 2003 became the Chairman of the Schizophrenia Trust.

In January 2004 he was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal. He also led an investigation for the Bar Council into widening access to the barrister profession. In 2007 he was made a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary and created a life peer as Baron Neuberger of Abbotsbury in the County of Dorset.

Lady Hale

Lady Hale

 

Deputy President of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Baroness Hale of Richmond

Lady Hale was appointed Deputy President of The Supreme Court in June 2013, succeeding Lord Hope of Craighead.

In January 2004, Lady Hale became the United Kingdom’s first woman Lord of Appeal in Ordinary after a varied career as an academic lawyer, law reformer, and judge. In October 2009 she became the first woman Justice of The Supreme Court.

After graduating from Cambridge in 1966, she taught law at Manchester University from 1966 to 1984, also qualifying as a barrister and practising for a while at the Manchester Bar. She specialised in Family and Social Welfare law, was founding editor of the Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, and authored a pioneering case book on ‘The Family, Law and Society’.

In 1984 she was the first woman to be appointed to the Law Commission, a statutory body which promotes the reform of the law. Important legislation resulting from the work of her team at the Commission includes the Children Act 1989, the Family Law Act 1996, and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. She also began sitting as an assistant recorder.

In 1994 she became a High Court judge, the first to have made her career as an academic and public servant rather than a practising barrister. In 1999 she was the second woman to be promoted to the Court of Appeal, before becoming the first woman Law Lord.

She retains her links with the academic world as Chancellor of the University of Bristol, Visitor of Girton College, Cambridge, and Visiting Professor of Kings College London.  A home maker as well as a judge, she thoroughly enjoyed helping the artists and architects create a new home for The Supreme Court.

Lord Mance

Lord Mance

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Mance

Lord Mance became a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary in 2005. He was from 1999 to 2005 a Lord Justice of Appeal and from 1993 to 1999 a Judge of the High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, where he also sat in the Commercial Court.

Lord Mance read law at University College, Oxford, spent time with a Hamburg law firm and then practised at the commercial bar and sat as a Recorder until 1993. He chaired various Banking Appeals Tribunals and was a founder director of the Bar Mutual Indemnity Insurance Fund.

He represented the United Kingdom on the Council of Europe’s Consultative Council of European Judges from 2000 to 2011, being elected its first chair from 2000 to 2003. He currently chairs the Executive Council of the International Law Association and the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on Private International Law. He is a member of the Judicial Integrity Group and of the seven person panel set up under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (article 255) to give an opinion on candidates’ suitability to perform the duties of Judge and Advocate-General of the European Court of Justice and General Court.

He served from 2007 to 2009 on the House of Lords European Union Select Committee, chairing sub-committee E which scrutinises proposals concerning European law and institutions. In 2006 he chaired a working group under the auspices of the All Party Parliamentary Group on the Great Lakes Region, recommending changes in the procedures for enforcement of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, and in 2008 he led an international delegation for the same Group and the Swedish Foundation for Human Rights, reporting on the problems of impunity in relation to violence against women in the Congo.

Lord Kerr

Lord Kerr

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore

Lord Kerr served as Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland from 2004 to 2009, and was the last Lord of Appeal in Ordinary appointed before the creation of The Supreme Court.

Lord Kerr was educated at St Colman’s College, Newry, and read law at Queen’s University, Belfast.  He was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 1970, and to the Bar of England and Wales at Gray’s Inn in 1974.

He served as Junior Crown Counsel from 1978 to 1983, at which point he took silk and served as Senior Crown Counsel from 1988 to 1993. In 1993 he was appointed a Judge of the High Court and knighted. He became Lord Chief Justice and joined the Privy Council in 2004.

Lord Kerr succeeded Lord Carswell of Killeen as Northern Ireland’s Lord of Appeal in Ordinary on 29 June 2009, the last Law Lord appointed before the creation of The Supreme Court.

 Lord Clarke

Lord Clarke

 

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon the Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony

Lord Clarke spent 27 years at the bar, specialising in maritime and commercial law, undertaking a wide variety of cases in these areas. He became a Recorder in 1985, sitting in both criminal and civil courts.

He conducted the Marchioness and Bowbelle Inquiries and was appointed Master of the Rolls in 2005. He is the first Justice to be appointed directly to The Supreme Court.

He was appointed to the High Court Bench in 1993 and in April that year succeeded Mr. Justice Sheen as the Admiralty Judge. He also sat in the Commercial Court and the Crown Court trying commercial and criminal cases respectively.

Appointed to the Court of Appeal in 1998, he was called upon to conduct first the Thames Safety Inquiry and in the following year the Marchioness and Bowbelle Inquiries. On 1 October 2005 he was appointed Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice.

Lord Wilson

Lord Wilson

 

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Wilson of Culworth

In 1967, after reading jurisprudence at Worcester College, Oxford, Lord Wilson was called to the Bar of England and Wales; and for the next 26 years, first as a junior and ultimately in silk, he practised almost exclusively in the field of family law.

From 1993 until 2005 he was a judge of the Family Division of the High Court. From 2005 until May 2011 he was a judge of the Court of Appeal.

In May 2011 he became a Justice of The Supreme Court.

Lord Sumption

Lord Sumption

After reading history at Magdalen College, Oxford, and serving for four years as a history Fellow of the College, Lord Sumption was called to the Bar (Inner Temple) in 1975 and took Silk in 1986. His practice covered all aspects of Commercial, EU and Competition, Public and Constitutional Law.

He was appointed as a Deputy High Court Judge in 1992 and served as a Recorder between 1993 and 2001. He was appointed as a Judge of the Courts of Appeal of Jersey and Guernsey in 1995. In January 2012 he became a Justice of The Supreme Court.

Lord Sumption was a Judicial Appointments Commissioner from 2006 to 2011. He is also an accomplished historian.

Lord Carnwath

Lord Carnwath

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill, CVO

After studying law at Trinity College, Cambridge, Lord Carnwath was called to the Bar (Middle Temple) in 1968 and took silk in 1985. He served as Attorney General to the Prince of Wales from 1988 to 1994.

He was a judge of the Chancery Division from 1994 to 2002, during which time (1998 to 2002) he was also Chairman of the Law Commission. Lord Carnwath was appointed to the Court of Appeal in 2002.

Between 2007 and 2012 he was Senior President of Tribunals and led the planning and implementation of the reforms of the tribunal system following the Leggatt report.

Lord Hughes

 Lord Hughes
Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Hughes of Ombersley

Lord Hughes was called to the Bar (Inner Temple) in 1970 and served as a Recorder of the Crown Court from 1985 to 1997. He became a Queen’s Counsel in 1990 and was later appointed a judge of the High Court (Family Division from 1997 to 2003; and Queen’s Bench Division from 2004 to 2006).

In 2006, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, serving as the Vice President of its Criminal Division from 2009 until his appointment as Justice of the Supreme Court in April 2013.

Lord Toulson

Lord Toulson

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Toulson

Lord Toulson was called to the Bar (Inner Temple) in 1969 and became a bencher in 1995. He became a Queen’s Counsel in 1986 and served as a Recorder of the Crown Court from 1987 to 1996. In 1996, he was appointed to the High Court (Queen’s Bench Division). He sat in the Commercial Court and in the Administrative Court and was then Presiding Judge on the Western Circuit from 1997 to 2002.

Between 2002 and 2006, Lord Toulson was Chairman of the Law Commission of England and Wales, after which he was appointed to the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in 2007. He has also served on the Judicial Appointments Commission for England and Wales.

Lord Toulson was appointed Justice of the Supreme Court in April 2013.

Lord Hodge

Lord Hodge

 

Justice of The Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Hodge

Lord Hodge was admitted to the Faculty of Advocates in 1983 and appointed a Queen’s Counsel in 1996. From 1997 – 2003, he was a part time Law Commissioner at the Scottish Law Commission.

Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court in April 2013, Lord Hodge was the Scottish Judge in Exchequer Causes and one of the Scottish Intellectual Property Judges. He was also a Judge in the Lands Valuation Appeal Court and a Commercial Judge.

Lord Hodge joined the Supreme Court in October 2013 as one of the two Scottish Justices.

The Mailshot:

On 11th June 2015 the cigpapers team sent a mailshot to the above twelve Supreme Court Judges. The mailshot was simply three of our leaflets with Coudenhove-Kalergi on one side and United Nations Resolution 260 against genocide on the other side in each envelope. The mailshot was sent to the Judges at House of Lords, Parliament, London, SW1A OAA as no stamp is required when writing to the Judges as members of the House of Lords.

Total Cost:

36 leaflets at 1.2 pence each = 43.2 pence

12 envelopes at 1.5 pence each = 18 pence

TOTAL COST = £0:61

TOTAL TIME = 10 minutes

All of our leaflets and stickers are available to buy. Email instock@gmx.com to order and pay.

The copyright-free pdf files for the leaflets are here:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/umu6jpf5mlf0eit/Coudenhove-KalergiA5A3%20-%20Copy.pdf?dl=0

CAMPAIGN: Anti-Globalisation Internet Meme Storm

Written by Cigpapers

Memes created by Watt Tyler

Anti-Globalisation Internet Meme Storm

With the internet now the main location for the alternative media and anti-Globalisation struggle, memes have become a very valuable tool. Memes can be endlessly put out on social network sites (Twitter, Facebook etc.) and many other parts of the internet. There are many free sites for making memes after obtaining the required photo or picture from Google Images:

https://imgflip.com/memegenerator

http://www.imagechef.com/meme-maker

Here are some of the memes we’ve been putting out which are free to use if you don’t want to make your own:

img818

img809

img803img752

img535

img804

img508img831

img754

img469

img599

img857

img519

img655

img794

img533

img565

img527

img664

11111111

img567

img722

img760

img569

img741

$(KGrHqN,!jME665(QLbIBO5zFNKvmQ~~_35

img741

img741

IMG522

img537

21092011576[1]

img627

IMG396

img488

img487

img486

img443

img287

img284

img285

img282

img278

img268

img106

img096

pic012

Picture 9

Picture 9

Picture 9

Picture 9

attachment

attachment

attachment

pic004

pic005

pic005

img640

img641

sun

SCAN

img779

SCAN

SCAN

untitled31

27092011583[1]

!Bw7b-h!!Wk~$(KGrHqN,!hEEv1+zyBfNBMLN9YlcZw~~_12

27092011583[1]

$(KGrHqF,!hkE7SmTE+7bBPGVh+itRw~~60_3

11111

$(KGrHqN,!jME665(QLbIBO5zFNKvmQ~~_35

15092011573[1]

img741

Picture 9

Did NASA Use Nazi War Criminals To Fake The Apollo Moon Landings? 20 Amazing Facts

Written by Cigpapers

Photos, Captions and Videos by Watt Tyler

NASA Apollo Moon Landing - Did they make it or did they fake it?

NASA Apollo Moon Landing – did they make it or did they fake it?

On the 20th July 1969 NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) claimed to have landed the first men on the Moon (Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin) with their Apollo 11 mission. NASA claimed to have made another five manned Moon landings ( Apollo Missions 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17) with Apollo 17 being the final mission landing on 7th December 1972. NASA still claims a total of 12 American astronauts walked on the Moon. All the alleged Moon landings used the Saturn V rocket system. The total cost of the Apollo missions is estimated at £203 billion in 2013 US dollars.

NASA was established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower and became operational on October 1, 1958.

NASA was established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower and became operational on 1st October  1958.

NASA gives the distance from the centre of Earth to the centre of the Moon as 239,000 miles. Since the Earth has a radius of about 4,000 miles and the Moon’s radius is roughly 1,000 miles, that leaves a surface-to-surface distance of 234,000 miles. The total distance traveled during the alleged missions, including Earth and Moon orbits, ranged from 622,268 miles for Apollo 13 to 1,484,934 miles for Apollo 17. It is accepted by the majority of People that the Apollo Moon landings were genuine, however the Cuban School National Curriculum and a growing number of sceptics claim the Apollo missions were faked. Even though this blog in no way alleges that Nazi war criminals faked the Moon landings we did find these 20 amazing facts:

1. Wernher von Braun:

Wernher Magnus Maximilian, Freiherr von Braun (March 23, 1912 – June 16, 1977) was a German rocket engineer and space architect. He was one of the leading figures in the development of rocket technology in Germany during World War II and, subsequently, in the United States. He is credited as being the “Father of Rocket Science”. In his 20s and early 30s, von Braun was the central figure in the Nazis’ rocket development program, responsible for the design and realization of the V-1 and V-2 combat rockets during World War II.

One of von Braun's V-2 Nazi rockets from World War Two.

One of von Braun’s V-2 Nazi rockets from World War Two. Firing these on a civilian population was a war crime.

Werner von Braun’s SS number was 185,068 and his Nazi Party membership number was 5,738,692, he ended the war as a SS Major. After the war, he and some select members of his rocket team were taken to the United States as part of the then-secret Operation Paperclip.

Wernher Von Braun in 1941.

Wernher von Braun in 1941. If it hadn’t been for Operation Paperclip von Braun and his team would almost certainly have faced war crime charges at Nuremberg for their role in the V-1 and V-2 rocket attacks on England during World War Two.

Operation Paperclip involved the USA taking a large number of German scientists, technicians and other staff to the USA after the war. The USA also appropriated about 300,000 German scientific patents.

Werner von Braun with American President John F Kennedy.

Werner von Braun with American President John F Kennedy.

 Former Nazi “Peenemunde” V-1 assistant Kurt H. Debus – who went on to become the first director of the Kennedy Space Center – helped develop the Saturn V rockets (designed in part after their V-1 Nazi rockets)

img445

Kurt H Debus became the first Director Of John F Kennedy Space Centre.

Werner Von Braun with the Saturn V rocket carrying the Apollo 11 Lunar Mission in 1969.

Werner von Braun in Florida with the Saturn V rocket carrying the Apollo 11 Lunar Mission in 1969.

2. Die Frau im Mond (The Woman in the Moon) Film:

In 1929 a German filmmaker called Fritz Lang released a silent film called Die Frau im Mond (The Woman in the Moon). The film’s technical adviser on the film was Herman Oberth, considered to be one of the three founding fathers of rocketry. Assisting Oberth on the film project was one of his brightest students, teenager Wernher von Braun.

The totally unnecessary vertical construction of the spaceship in a specially built hangar is the same in the film and the Apollo Missions.

The totally unnecessary vertical construction of the spaceship in a specially built hangar is the same in the film Die Frau im Mond  and the Apollo Missions.

A decade-and-a-half later, both Oberth and von Braun would be scooped up through Operation Paperclip and brought to America to work on the Apollo Missions, whose choreography just happened to very closely match that of the fake Moon launch Oberth and von Braun had crafted forty years earlier.

Another still from the 1929 film.

Another still from the 1929 film.

Maybe it’s just a coincidence that a 1929 silent German film had the same rocket technology as 1960s/70s American Moon landings.

The grand opening of the massive hangar doors and the excruciatingly slow roll-out of the upright rocketship from the hangar to the launch pad are the same in the 1929 film and the Apollo Missions.

The grand opening of the massive hangar doors and the excruciatingly slow roll-out of the upright rocket ship from the hangar to the launch pad are the same in the 1929 film and the Apollo Missions.

Both the film (Die Frau im Mond) and the Apollo Missions also both had the famous countdowns and the cheering, patriotic crowds.

Cheering crowds during teh countdown in the 1929 film.

Cheering crowds during the countdown in the 1929 film.

Screenclip  from the silent film "Die Frau im Mond".

Screenclip from the silent film “Die Frau im Mond”.

The 1929 silent film  Die Frau im Mond had a storyline that was a cross between Apollo Mission 11 (first alleged man on the Moon) and Apollo Mission 13 (aborted Moon landing after an oxygen tank allegedly exploded).

Not Jim Lovell on Apollo Mission 13 but actually the 1929 film "Die Frau im Mond".

Not Jim Lovell on Apollo Mission 13 but actually the 1929 film “Die Frau im Mond”.

The 1929 silent film  Die Frau im Mond and the 1960s/1970s Apollo Missions both had the same team of technical advisers.

3. America Versus Russia In The Space Race:

After World War Two America and Russia entered in to an arms race and a space race. Until the Apollo Moon landings Russia had beaten the Americans in every “first” in the space race:

            May 15, 1957 – The Soviet Union tests the R-7 Semyorka, the world’s first intercontinental ballistic missile.

         October 4, 1957 – The Soviets launch Sputnik 1, Earth’s first manmade satellite.

         November 3, 1957 – A dog named Laika becomes the first animal to enter Earth orbit aboard the Soviet Sputnik 2.

         January 2, 1959 – The Soviet Luna 1 becomes the first manmade object to leave Earth’s orbit.

         September 13, 1959 – After an intentional crash landing, the Soviet Luna 2 becomes the first manmade object on the Moon.

         October 6, 1959 – The Soviet Luna 3 provides mankind with its first look at the far side of the Moon.

         August 20, 1960 – Belka and Strelka, aboard the Soviet Sputnik 5, are the first animals to safely return from Earth orbit.

         October 14, 1960 – The Soviet Marsnik 1, the first probe sent from Earth to Mars, blasts off.

         February 12, 1961 – The Soviet Venera 1, the first probe sent from Earth to Venus, blasts off.

         April 12, 1961 – Yuri Gagarin, riding aboard the Soviet Vostok 1, becomes the first man in Earth orbit.

         May 19, 1961 – The Soviet Venera 1 performs the first ever fly by of another planet (Venus).

         August 6, 1961 – Gherman Titov, aboard the Soviet Vostok 2, becomes the first man to spend over a day in space and the first to sleep in Earth orbit.

         August 11 & 12, 1962 – The Soviet Vostok 3 and Vostok 4 are launched, the first simultaneous manned space flights (though they do not rendezvous).

         October 12, 1964 – The Soviet Voskhod 1, carrying the world’s first multi-man crew, is launched.

         March 18, 1965 – Aleksei Leonov, riding aboard the Soviet Voskhod 2, performs the first space-walk.

         February 3, 1966 – The Soviet Luna 9 becomes the first probe to make a controlled, ‘soft’ landing on the Moon.

         March 1, 1966 – The Soviet Venera 3, launched November 16, 1965, becomes the first probe to impact another planet (Venus).

         April 3, 1966 – The Soviet Luna 10 becomes the first manmade lunar satellite.

        October 30, 1967 – The Soviet Cosmos 186 and Cosmos 188 become the first unmanned spacecraft to rendezvous and dock in Earth orbit. The United States will not duplicate this maneuver for nearly four decades.

        January 16, 1969 – The Soviet Soyuz 4 and Soyuz 5 become the first manned spacecraft to dock in Earth orbit and the first to exchange crews.

        November 17, 1970 – The Soviet Lunokhod 1, the first robotic rover to land on and explore an extraterrestrial body, lands on the Moon. Twenty-seven years later, the United States lands it’s very first robotic rover on Mars.

        December 15, 1970 – The Soviet Venera 7 becomes the first probe to make a soft landing on another planet (Venus).

        April 19, 1971 – The Soviet Salyut 1 becomes the world’s first orbiting space station.

        August 22, 1972 – The Soviet Mars 2 becomes the first probe to reach the surface of Mars.

On April 14, 1961, two days after Gagarin’s historic flight, a panicked President Kennedy reportedly inquired of NASA what goal in space America might be able to attain before the Soviets. According to legend, President Kennedy was told that America’s best hope to beat the Russians was with a manned Moon landing. At Rice University on September 12th, 1962 President Kennedy made the following speech setting the goal of the Moon landings by the end of the 1960s:

4. NASA Has Lost All Data, Blueprints And Records From The Apollo Missions:

Following Freedom Of Information requests in America NASA admitted it had lost all their original video footage of the Apollo Missions. Unfortunately, it isn’t just the video footage that is missing. Also allegedly beamed back from the Moon was voice data, biomedical monitoring data, and telemetry data to monitor the location and mechanical functioning of the spaceship. All of that data, the entire alleged record of the Moon landings, was on the 13,000+ reels that are said to be ‘missing.’ Also missing, according to NASA and its various subcontractors, are the original plans/blueprints for the lunar modules. And for the spacesuits and lunar rovers. And for the entire multi-sectioned Saturn V rockets.

NASA have lost all records of the Apollo Missions - that's 700 cartons altogether.

NASA have lost all records of the Apollo Missions – that’s 700 cartons altogether.

5. The Apollo A7L Space Suits Used In The Apollo Missions:

The Space Suits used in the Apollo Missions were the A7L design.International Latex Corporation, which was best known as the manufacturer of Playtex bras and girdles, was awarded the contract. Hamilton Standard was awarded the contract to design and build the life-support packs known as PLSS units. All designs and blueprints for the A7L space suits have been lost.

NASA's officially released photograph of the Apollo Missions Space Suit.

NASA’s officially released photograph of the Apollo Missions Space Suit A7L.

Conditions on the Moon are very different to Earth as there is no atmosphere. The temperature in sunlight is estimated by NASA to be 107 degrees Celsius (225 degrees Fahrenheit) and in the shade is minus 153 degrees Celsius (minus 243 degrees Fahrenheit). There is also a constant bombardment of meteoroids.“Meteoroids,” NASA states, “are nearly-microscopic specks of space dust that fly through space at speeds often exceeding 50,000 mph – ten times faster than a speeding bullet. They pack a considerable punch … The tiny space bullets can plow directly into Moon rocks, forming miniature and unmistakable craters.” There is also the problem of massive space radiation on the Moon as there is no atmosphere like on Earth to protect it.

NASA diagram of the shield it believes will be required to protect astronauts in future Moon landings from radiation and meteoroids. They didn't bother with this in the 1960s.

NASA diagram of the shield it believes will be required to protect astronauts in future Moon landings from radiation and meteoroids. NASA didn’t bother with this in the 1960s and 1970s.

NASA has now stated that maintaining 100% clean-room conditions on space exploration vehicles while performing EVAs on planetary bodies is essential as even the smallest amount of dust could cripple any space ship. Their solution for future Moon landings is the “rear-entry spacesuit” which is attached to the outside of a lunar module and is climbed in to before detaching from the lunar module. The procedure is reversed to get back in the lunar module.

NASA diagram of the rear-entry spacesuit it has designed for future Moon landings.

NASA diagram of the rear-entry spacesuit it has designed for future Moon landings. In the 1960s and 1970s NASA didn’t worry about details like clean-room conditions.

The A7L must have been a remarkable spacesuit, it was radiation proof, able to withstand 50,000 MPH meteoroids and able to switch between 107 degrees Celsius (225 degrees Fahrenheit) and minus 153 degrees Celsius (minus 243 degrees Fahrenheit) in an instant. The A7L also had a full life-support system, oxygen and human waste management. Unfortunately we can not inspect, or even recreate, these spacesuits as NASA claims it has lost all the designs and blueprints. NASA claims the spacesuits themselves were left on the Moon to save weight on the return journey.

6. The Van Allen Radiation Belts:

The Van Allen radiation belts are two regions of radiation that encircle the Earth. They are named in honor of James Van Allen, the scientist who led the team that launched the first successful satellite that could detect radioactive particles in space. This was Explorer 1, which launched in 1958 and led to the discovery of the radiation belts. There is a large outer belt that follows the magnetic field lines essentially from the north to south poles around the planet. This belt begins around 8,400 to 36,000 miles above the surface of the Earth. The inner belt does not extend as far north and south. It runs, on average, from 60 miles about the Earth’s surface to about 6,000 miles. The two belts expand and shrink. Sometimes the outer belt nearly disappears. Sometimes it swells so much that the two belts appear to merge to form one big radiation belt.In 1969-70 the Van Allen Belt was at it’s 11 year cycle peak radiation

pic006

Due to the Van Allen radiation belts no manned space craft has ever travelled more than 400 miles above the Earth’s surface, apart from the Apollo missions. On June 24, 2005, NASA made this rather remarkable admission: “NASA’s Vision for Space Exploration calls for a return to the Moon as preparation for even longer journeys to Mars and beyond. But there’s a potential showstopper: radiation. Space beyond low-Earth orbit is awash with intense radiation from the Sun and from deep galactic sources such as supernovas … Finding a good shield is important.” The Russians have calculated that to protect their cosmonauts from radiation a 4 foot (120cm) thick lead casing would be needed.

7. Shadows On Moon Photographs:

According to NASA the Apollo Moon missions carried no lighting equipment, and the only light source for Apollo photographs and videos was the sun. Despite this there seems to be at least two light sources on a number of Apollo photographs due to there being shadows cast in two directions.Here is an example of these two light source photographs:

pic004

In other photographs it appears the light source is much closer than the Sun would be:

pic004

8. The Lunar Explorer Modules:

The Lunar Explorer Modules (LEM) were the part of the Apollo missions that detached from the Command Service Modules (CSM)and descended to the Moon’s surface. The LEMs were all designed and built by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation of New York. Even though no designs or blueprints still exist for LEMs or CSMs here is a NASA diagram of a LEM:

pic005

The LEMs had an exterior measurement of about 12 foot by 12 foot (360cmX360cm) according to NASA, with a crew compartment of about 6 foot by 6 foot by 6 foot (180cmX180cmX180cm). Due to lower gravity on the Moon it had an effective weight of about 3 tons on the Lunar surface. For the descent stage, there is the reverse-thrust rocket that allegedly allowed the craft to make a soft landing on the Moon. And then for the ascent stage a powerful rocket propels the top half of the LEM into lunar orbit. The LEM would then dock with the CSM that NASA state was orbiting the Moon at about 4,000 MPH.

Photograph of a LEM on the Lunar surface released by NASA.

Photograph of a LEM allegedly on the Lunar surface released by NASA.

NASA claimed there was no room for seats in the LEMs, but never indicated where the astronauts slept during their time on the Moon’s surface.

Close up of photograph serial number AS11-40-5922 released by NASA.

Close up of photograph serial number AS11-40-5922 released by NASA.

9. The Lunar Roving Vehicle:

The Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) or Lunar Rover was a battery-powered four-wheeled rover used on the Moon in the last three missions of the American Apollo Missions ( 15,16 and 17) during 1971 and 1972. It was popularly known as the Moon Buggy.It was a fragile looking, open-space vehicle about 10 feet long with large mesh wheels, antenna appendages, tool caddies and cameras. Powered by two 36-volt batteries, it had four one-fourth hp drive motors, one for each wheel.The LRV was transported to the Moon on the Lunar Explorer Modules (LEMs) and, once unpacked on the surface, could carry one or two astronauts, their equipment, and lunar samples. According to NASA the three LRVs remain on the Moon.

LRV from Apollo 15 mission allegedly photographed on the Moon in 1971.

LRV from Apollo 15 mission allegedly photographed on the Moon in 1971. Notice there are boot prints but no tyre tracks – did the LRV float in to this position? NASA photo serial number As15-88-11901

The first cost-plus-incentive-fee contract to Boeing was for $19,000,000 ( about $150,000,000 in 2013 US Dollars) and called for delivery of the first LRV by 1 April 1971. Cost overruns, however, led to a final cost of $38,000,000, ( about $300,000,000 in 2013 US Dollars)which was about the same as NASA’s original estimate. When questioned how the LRVs could fit in the LEMs NASA claimed that they folded in to the size of a suitcase.

Apart from the mystery tyre tracks NASA must use some big suitcases.

The LRV could only be being unpacked in this photograph as NASA didn’t re-pack any LRVs as they were all allegedly left on the Moon. Apart from the mystery tyre tracks NASA must use some big suitcases.

NASA are planning a manned trip to the Moon in the 2020s or 2030s. They have released photographs of their prototype Lunar Rovers which will be radiation and meteoroid proof.

NASA prototype Lunar Rover for future manned moon trips. Not as cool as the 1970s version but much safer from radiation and meteoroids.

NASA prototype Lunar Rover for future manned Moon trips. Not as cool as the 1960s/1970s version but much safer from radiation and meteoroids.

Here is a video of the Lunar Rover on the alleged Apollo 16 mission:

Here is another good Lunar Rover video:

10.The Lunar Explorer Module Landing Sites:

The Lunar Explorer Modules (LEM) were the part of the Apollo missions that detached from the Command Service Modules (CSM)and descended to the Moon’s surface. Due to lower gravity on the Moon it had an effective weight of about 3 tons on the Lunar surface. For the descent stage, there is the reverse-thrust rocket that allegedly allowed the craft to make a soft landing on the Moon.

NASA photograph of a LEM allegedly on the Moon's surface. As can be clearly seen no dust has been displaced by the reverse thrust rockets which were allegedly used.

NASA photograph of a LEM allegedly on the Moon’s surface. As can be clearly seen no dust has been displaced by the reverse-thrust rockets which were allegedly used.

The reverse-thrust rocket system would have created a crater under the LEM landing site, and would probably have turned the dust in to a glass-like substance. In the photograph below you can’t see so much as a single grain of ‘lunar soil’ settled onto the lunar modules while they were setting down.

Another NASA photograph of a LEM allegedly on the Moon's surface. It can again be clearly seen no dust has been displaced by the reverse-thrust rockets which were allegedly used.

Another NASA photograph of a LEM allegedly on the Moon’s surface. It can again be clearly seen no dust has been displaced by the reverse-thrust rockets which were allegedly used.

11. Evidence Of Studio Lighting On Apollo Mission Photographs:

NASA has repeatedly stated that there was no artificial lighting used on the Apollo Moon landings and the only light source for videos and photographs is the Sun. However a careful study of numerous Apollo photographs would seem to indicate the use of studio lighting suggesting the “landings” were filmed and photographed in a film studio.

In one shot (AS14-64-9089) studio-lighting representing the sun is seen reflecting off a black background, a photographic effect that couldn’t happen in the blackness of space, and could only reflect off a background

In one shot (AS14-64-9089) studio-lighting representing the sun is seen reflecting off a black background, a photographic effect that couldn’t happen in the blackness of space, and could only reflect off a background

In this Apollo 12 photograph there appears to be the reflection of what can only be an overhead studio light.

In this Apollo 12 photograph there appears to be the reflection of what can only be an overhead studio light.

This Apollo 12 photograph (AS12-49-7278) shows two lens flares from overhead lighting.

This Apollo 12 photograph (AS12-49-7278) shows two lens flares from overhead lighting.

The angles of the shadows in this Apollo 14 photograph (AS14-68-9486) indicate a light source just to the left of the photograph. This can't be the Sun and can only be an artificial light.

The angles of the shadows in this Apollo 14 photograph (AS14-68-9486) indicate a light source just to the left of the photograph. This can’t be the Sun and can only be an artificial light.

12. The Fake Moon Rocks:

On their return from the alleged Apollo 11 Moon landing Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins toured together giving “Moon rocks” to grateful countries around the World. Altogether NASA gave over 100 countries “Moon rocks”

A "moon rock" that turned out to be petrified wood when tested by scientists. How radioactive would a real rock from the Moon be?

A “Moon rock” that turned out to be petrified wood when tested by scientists. How radioactive would a real rock from the Moon be?

Whenever they have been tested these alleged “Moon rocks” have turned out to be fakes. Here is an article from the British mainstream media about a fake “Moon rock” :

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

One other point is that surely a genuine rock brought from the surface of the Moon would have been highly radioactive, and far too dangerous for public display.

13.Laser Reflectors Left On The Moon:

One piece of evidence NASA repeatedly quote is that they left laser reflectors on the Moon which are still there. NASA claim that they can prove the laser reflectors are on the Moon because they can bounce lasers off them to measure the distance from the Earth to the Moon.

Laser reflector that NASA claims it left on the Moon.

Laser reflector that NASA claims it left on the Moon.

 According to NASA the fact that observatories to this day bounce lasers off the alleged reflectors proves that the Apollo missions succeeded. It is perfectly obvious though that the targets, if there, could have been placed robotically – most likely by the Soviets. It is also possible that there are no laser targets on the Moon. In December 1966, National Geographic reported that scientists at MIT had been achieving essentially the same result for four years by bouncing a laser off the surface of the Moon. The New York Times added that the Soviets had been doing the same thing since at least 1963, possibly as early as 1962 or even 1961.

You might have used one of the laser room measurers that most hardware / DIY shops carry nowadays. They manage to measure the size of rooms by bouncing a laser off opposite walls without any laser reflector.

14.Onboard Computer System:

NASA claim that the onboard computer for the Apollo Missions had a memory capacity of about 72 kilobytes – that is less powerful than most modern digital watches. NASA have never clarified whether this computer was on the Command Service Module (orbiting the Moon at 4,000 miles per hour) or either part of the two-part Lunar Exploration Module. Therefore either the CSM or the LEM had no onboard computer.

1960s computers were total crap.

1960s computers were total crap. Maybe that’s why NASA only shared one between the CSM and LEM.

The most complicated aspect of the Apollo missions was the landing of the lunar modules, which made the software program controlling that part of the mission the most difficult to design. Amazingly though, that aspect of the software design was not assigned until after most of the other programmes were 2/3 complete – and it was assigned to a twenty-two-year-old gent named Don Isles who had just recently started his very first job. According to Moon Machines, “the programme without which it would be impossible to land on the Moon … had been written almost as an afterthought by a junior engineer.”

15. Mission Control In Houston Texas:

All the Apollo  missions were allegedly controlled by Mission Control at the Johnson Space Centre in Houston, Texas.

Mission Control in Huston, Texas looked very impressive. However it was totally fake.

Mission Control in Houston, Texas looked very impressive. However it was totally fake.

Mission Control looked like the cutting edge of 1960s technology at the time. However it has now been revealed that the staff were simply store clerks hired to pretend to be NASA scientists. A 2005 documentary entitled First on the Moon: The Untold Story, showed that Mission Control at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas “was not as high-tech as it looked.” In reality, as Apollo 11 computer engineer Jack Garman tells us, “the computer screens that we looked at in Mission Control weren’t computer screens at all. They were televisions. All the letters, or characters, [they] were all hand drawn. I don’t necessarily mean with a brush, but I mean they were painted on a slide.” Jack Garman was allegedly the member of the Apollo 11 ground-crew who cleared the Eagle to land despite the fact that multiple alarms were going off.

16. NASA Claims Photos Proved The Moon Landings Happened:

  NASA launched the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) on June 18th 2009 to photograph and map the Moon to find safe landing sites for Moon landings. NASA claims to have taken photographs of the Apollo 11 landing site and the bottom half of the LEM which didn’t return. Here are the photos that allegedly prove the Apollo missions to the Moon took place.

I can't see anything from 500 meters up - maybe if we got closer.

I can’t see anything from 500 metres up – maybe if we got closer.

 As you can see from 500 metres above the Moon there is no visible sign of the bottom half of the LEM from the Apollo 11 mission.

NASA claim that these photos from 200 metres up clearly show the Apollo 11 landing site and the bottom half of the LEM.

NASA claim that these photos from 200 metres up clearly show the Apollo 11 landing site and the bottom half of the LEM.

17. Lack Of Stars:

One argument for the Apollo Moon landings being hoaxed is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the Moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.

img370

 Did NASA realise it impossible to map out the exact locations of all the stars for the hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out? Intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did actually give).

Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and still see them.

Here is a video of Patrick Moore asking the Apollo 11 astronauts whether they could see stars from the Moon:

18. Faked Moon Walks:

 Over the years there have been some serious questions raised about the film of Astronauts allegedly walking on the Moon. NASA claims the original Apollo footage has been lost but copies of it recorded by TV stations at the time are still available. One of the main criticisms is that with one sixth gravity the Astronauts don’t seem to be able to jump very high and when speeded up their jumps seem very Earthly. Also if you look how the dust is thrown up it also seems very similar to Earth which it obviously shouldn’t be.

Here is one video out of many showing these flaws in the footage:

19. Stanley Kubrick And Front Screen Projection:

Stanley Kubrick (July 26, 1928 – March 7, 1999) was a jewish American film director, screenwriter, producer, cinematographer and editor who did much of his work in the United Kingdom. Stanley Kubrick is regarded as one of the greatest and most influential directors of all time. His films are noted for their unique cinematography, attention to detail in the service of realism, and the evocative use of music.

Stanley Kubrick in 1971.

Stanley Kubrick in 1971.

What is Front Screen Projection?

Kubrick did not invent the process but there is no doubt that he perfected it.Front Screen Projection is a cinematic device that allows scenes to be projected behind the actors so that it appears, in the camera, as if the actors are moving around on the set provided by the Front Screen Projection.The process came into fruition when the 3M company invented a material called Scotchlite. This was a screen material that was made up of hundreds of thousands of tiny glass beads each about .4 millimeters wide. These beads were highly reflective. In the Front Screen Projection process the Scotchlite screen would be placed at the back of the soundstage. The plane of the camera lens and the Scotchlite screen had to be exactly 90 degrees apart. A projector would project the scene onto the Scotchlite screen through a mirror and the light would go through a beam splitter, which would pass the light into the camera. An actor would stand in front of the Scotchlite screen, and he would appear to be “inside” the projection.

How "Front Screen Projection" works.

How “Front Screen Projection” works.

In Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey Kubrick uses “Front Screen Projection” in several scenes.

Scene from Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) using the "Front Screen Projection" technique.

Scene from Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) using the “Front Screen Projection” technique.

The same scene with a line showing the set and the background Scotchlite Front Projection Screen.

The same scene with a line showing the set and the background Scotchlite Front Projection Screen.

In the example above of “Front Screen Projection” the part under the line is a stage set and the part above is a screen. Looking at the Apollo Mission photos below the same technique seems to have been used.

A still photograph from the Apollo 17 Mission.

A still photograph from the Apollo 17 Mission.

The same photo from Apollo 17 with a line showing the back of the set.

The same photo from Apollo 17 with a line showing where the back of the set looks to be.

Another photo from Apollo Mission 17.

Another photo from Apollo Mission 17.

The same photo from Apollo Mission 17 with a line indicating where the set ends and the Scotchlite Front Projection Screen begins.

The same photo from Apollo Mission 17 with a line indicating where the set seems to end and the Scotchlite Front Projection Screen begins.

 Here is an extensive study of Apollo imagery by photo analyst Jack White BA:

http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html

20. Return Trips To The Moon:

In 2005 NASA started their  Constellation Programme (abbreviated CxP) to put men back on the Moon. They originally planned to get a man on the Moon by 2028 ( over three times longer than in the 1960s ) but soon pushed that date back to 2035.

img422

On June 24, 2005, NASA made this rather remarkable admission: “NASA’s Vision for Space Exploration calls for a return to the Moon as preparation for even longer journeys to Mars and beyond. But there’s a potential showstopper: radiation. Space beyond low-Earth orbit is awash with intense radiation from the Sun and from deep galactic sources such as supernovas … Finding a good shield is important.” The Russians have calculated that to protect their cosmonauts from radiation a 4 foot (120cm) thick lead casing would be needed.

In 2010 the Constellation Programme was put on the back-burner, due to insurmountable technical problems, after around $50 billion had been spent on it. NASA could have obviously used the 1960s Apollo designs if they hadn’t all been lost.

If NASA Did Fake The Moon Landings: Why? Where? How? Who?

Why?  If NASA did fake the Moon landings the obvious reason is that after John F Kennedy stated that America would put a man on the Moon before the end of the 1960s America couldn’t really back down. They would probably not have realised before about 1963 that it was impossible, and by then they had gone through 10s of billions of Dollars of taxpayers money. The loss of prestige, both at home and abroad, could have even brought down the American military/industrial complex and the American elite.

Where? If NASA did fake the Moon landings then the fake footage could have been shot at many locations, and probably more than one. NASA had its own recreations of the Moon surface and such places as Area 51, Lauren Canyon in Hollywood or even the set of Space Odyssey: 2001 could all have easily been used.

How? Faking the Moon landings would have been a lot easier than actually making the Moon landings. Everything the public saw on Earth would have been real apart from the Astronauts would have left the Saturn V rocket secretly before take off. The empty Saturn V rocket would have blasted off empty and fallen back to Earth, while NASA reported that the CSM and LEM were on their way to the Moon. After that all NASA had to do was bounce the fake transmissions off the Moon back to Earth. For the return “splashdown” they could have simply dropped the CSM from a helicopter or transport plane.

Who? The favourite suggestion for who directed the Apollo footage, if it was fake, is obviously Stanley Kubrick who made several references to the Apollo Missions in his other films. Another intriguing possibility is that director Roman Polanski was either involved or knew too much and a lot of his troubles, including the murder of Sharon Tate, are linked to the Apollo Missions.

Book Review: The Holocaust Hoax Exposed by Victor Thorn

This is the book you need to read if you are new to 'the Jewish question'!

This is the book you need to read if you are new to ‘the Jewish question’!

THE TRUTH IS DANGEROUS

Today, if a book similar to this one were published in Europe, its author would be arrested and imprisoned. Their crime: simply questioning the so-called holocaust where six million Jews were allegedly exterminated during WW II.

Indeed, researchers have endured solitary confinement, brutal beatings by Jewish assailants, ongoing harassment, lengthy court battles, career suicide, and media attacks directed against their work – all because they presented a “revisionist history” of this pivotal event.

Other writers have been the victims of hate crimes, extensive smear campaigns, fines, death threats, and monetary rewards placed upon their heads after going into hiding.

The perpetrators behind these jack-booted Thought Police tactics are an entire holohoax industry devoted to suppressing factual data in favour of peddling heavy-handed doses of propaganda.

Despite these obvious dangers, The Holocaust Hoax Exposed dissects every element of what has become the 20th century’s most grotesque conspiracy. Covered in jarring detail is the mythology surrounding “concentration camps,” the truth about Zyklon B, Anne Frank’s fable, how the absurd “six million” figure has become a laughing stock, and the betrayal by maniacal Zionists of their own Jewish people that led to their deaths (via starvation and disease) after Allied bombings cut off supply lines to German work camps.

Yet, the only way an Israeli state could be created on stolen Palestinian land following WWII was through the most outlandish lies imaginable. Consequently, the holohoax industry has become a tyrannical dictatorship that incessantly manipulates, distorts, marginalises and manufactures false results to achieve their Machiavellian ends. By taking their hysterical obsessions to psychopathic levels, the charlatans behind this ruse make it glaringly apparent how weak their foundation is.

To compensate, these intellectually dishonest conmen (and women) continue to persecute revisionist historians all because they’re incapable of supporting their arguments through legitimate debate. The Holocaust Hoax Exposed is the final nail in a rotting coffin that has long been buried beneath a plethora of deceit.

Holohoax-stories-3

Oy Vey!

Oy Vey!

It sure is a great demolition job of the Holohoax. In fact, this book makes such a mockery of the 20th century’s biggest lie that you will literally ‘laugh out loud’ or LOL at certain bits! Yep, a five year old could see through the Holohoax with just a little bit of study. That’s how badly constructed the Holohoax lie truly is!

I remember the first time I ever looked into the possibility of the Holocaust being a fabrication. It took me about 10 to 15 minutes to know that it was a load of shit. Then it took a few months for the enormity of the lie to truly sink in. Once it has sunk in you realise just how strong the Jewish death grip is over the mass-media and everything else for that matter!

Also try this article:

Holocaust Or Holohoax? 21 Amazing Facts:

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/holocaust-or-holohoax-21-amazing-facts/

BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006

pic005

In 2006 the BBC hosted a climate-change seminar to decide on its reporting of alleged climate-change. The BBC has spent tens of thousands of pounds trying to keep secret who attended this seminar. The publicly funded broadcaster fought off requests for the list of people who attended under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws.

This surreal story is only partly about climate change: the disclosure raises questions about the evidence submitted to the information tribunal by the BBC and Helen Boaden – it’s Director of News who stepped down in 2012.

The case also highlights once again the BBC’s corporate strategy of using an FOI derogation, or legal “opt-out” clause, to withhold a wide range of material from citizens who wish to know whether the BBC is fulfilling its statutory obligations for impartiality under its Royal Charter.

And it raises further questions about the effectiveness of the BBC Trust. The trust, which replaced the Board of Governors, was created with a mission: an “unprecedented obligation to openness and transparency”.

pic005

A ‘brainstorm’ that became historic

The seminar whose attendees the Beeb sought to keep secret was founded by three organisation. In 2004, the International Broadcasting Trust – a lobby group funded by a number of charities, including many involved in campaigning on climate change – devised the first in a series of seminars on development issues, where the lobbyists could address broadcasters.

One event on 26 January 2006 was a “brainstorm”, in the IBT’s own words, “focusing on climate change and its impact on development”. The BBC sent 30 senior staff, and 30 outsiders were invited. The event was also organised by CMEP, its second parent – a now dormant or defunct outfit operated by BBC reporter Roger Harrabin and climate activist Dr Joe Smith, and at one time funded by the Tyndall Centre at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and various pressure groups.

Harrabin later explained that the BBC’s head of news in the 1990s, Tony Hall, had invited him “to devise meetings with politicians, business people, think tanks, academics from many universities and specialists (science, technology, economic and social sciences, and history), and policy experts and field workers from NGOs – particularly from the developing world”.

The third parent of the seminar was the BBC.

 The following year ( 2007) a BBC Trust report  on impartiality cited the 2006 seminar and said it had settled the argument once and for all  (as far as the BBC was concerned) on climate change.

pic005

Filmmaker John Bridcut wrote:

The BBC has held a high-level seminar with some of the best scientific experts [our emphasis] and has come to the view that the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus [on anthropogenic climate change].

The BBC is under a statutory obligation to remain impartial, so this gave the “brainstorm” a historic significance.

An independent blogger, Tony Newbery, was struck by the difference between contemporary evidence that the seminar was educational and composed largely of activists (as confirmed by Harrabin) and the BBC Trust’s insistence that it was a sober scientific presentation that could justify a historic policy change.

Fresh light was shed on Harrabin’s CMEP in 2010, in the second batch of Climategate emails. An email from Mike Hulme, the director of the Tyndall Centre for Climatic Change Research at UEA,complained about a BBC Radio 4 item broadcast in February 2002. The broadcast featured global-warming sceptic Professor Philip Stott and Sir John Houghton, who was a Met Office chief and the editor of the first three IPCC reports on climate change. Houghton came off worst, and an infuriated Hulme wrote:

Did anyone hear Stott vs Houghton on Today, Radio 4 this morning? Woeful stuff really. This is one reason why Tyndall is sponsoring the Cambridge Media/Environment Programme to starve this type of reporting at source.

Newbery filed his FOI request for the seminar’s attendees to the BBC in 2007 and was denied the information, leading to a second round of information tribunal hearings in November 2012. The cross-examination of the BBC’s Helen Boaden in a court room was reported here.

The BBC is regarded as a public authority by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, but it can withhold information held “for the purposes of journalism”.

In an earlier and separate FOI case against the BBC, Supreme Court Judge Neuberger argued the opt-out should be interpreted narrowly – otherwise the BBC could withhold information about “cleaning the board room floor” using the journalism get-out clause – an obvious absurdity.

In the Newbery case, the BBC maintained that archival material on the seminar could not be found, but also it should not be found: as a back-up argument it argued that the seminar was held under the Chatham House Rule – an agreement of etiquette, rather than a law, to prevent quotes being attributed to particular speakers at a meeting – information that Newbery had never asked for.

In November 2012 the tribunal ruled against Newbery and for the BBC.

pic005

Case closed? Think again

However science writer Maurizio Morabito has unearthed the list of attendees.

It confirms the accuracy of Harrabin’s description of the composition of the invitees, with most coming from industry, think tanks and NGOs. And as suspected, climate campaigners Greenpeace are present, while actual scientific experts are thin on the ground: not one attendee deals with attribution science, the physics of global warming. These are scarcely “some of the best scientific experts”, whose input could justify a historic abandonment of the BBC’s famous impartiality.

Intriguingly, Tony Newbery had been supplied with a later version of this document, he tells us – but with the attendee list stripped out.

How much of the Public's license fee did the BBC spend on lawyers to cover up this list of attendees at their Climate Panel in 2006?

How much of the Public’s license fee did the BBC spend on lawyers to cover up this list of attendees at their Climate Panel in 2006?

The dramatic appearance of the list raises many questions. Did the BBC know the information was publicly available? If so, why were corporation lawyers spending thousands of pounds to keep a public document “secret”? (FOI requests for public information typically state, quite simply, “this information is public”.)

Questions abound  online about the ability of the BBC Trust to maintain its duty to transparency. The BBC’s legal strategy entails the indiscriminate application of its FOI derogation “for the purposes of journalism” – this effectively rewrites the 2000 Act, and redefines the BBC as a private body. The trust is surely aware of this; it has a small mountain of correspondence on the subject. But it has yet to enquire, let alone pronounce on whether this is healthy – or legal.

All the names on the revealed seminar list

Here’s the list – according to the FOI Act reply.

January 26th 2006, BBC Television Centre, London

Specialists:
Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant
Trevor Evans, US Embassy
Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
Anuradha Vittachi, Director, Oneworld.net
Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation
Claire Foster, Church of England
Saleemul Huq, IIED
Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University
Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
Matthew Farrow, CBI
Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs
Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs
Joe Smith, The Open University
Mark Galloway, Director, IBT
Anita Neville, E3G
Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University
Tim Jackson, Surrey University
John Ashton, Director E3G
BBC attendees:
Jana Bennett, Director of Television
Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science
Helen Boaden, Director of News
Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual
Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent
Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV
John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual
Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering
Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs
Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures
Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning
Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live
Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit
Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News
Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend
Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations
Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes

Fran Unsworth,Head of Newsgathering
Pete Clifton, Head of News Interactive
Liz Cleaver, Controller Learning
Keith Scholey, Head of Specialist Factual
Sarah Brandist, Head of Development, Drama Commissioning
Michael Hastings, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility
Lorna Walsh, BBC TV
Roger Harrabin, Today Programme

The New SS: UK Lawyers, Judges And Social Workers Colluding To Steal Children

by thecolemanexperience

The New SSThe Law SocietyDerbyshire CouncilCourtsChild SnatcherJail Social WorkersBookerJohn Hemming MPSnatched Children

Time and time again we hear tell of children being snatched from loving parents by despicable social workers, desperate to meet targets and make bonuses, and thrown into the corrupt and secretive world of the UK’s family courts systems.

One of the few MP’s brave enough and caring enough to highlight these cases is Birmingham MP, John Hemming, who recently broke parliamentary convention by naming and shaming Derbeyshire Council who colluded with lawyers and the courts to snatch two young children on misleading evidence.

The Express reports on the story:

” TWO YOUNG children were taken from their distraught mother and placed for adoption because her own legal aid lawyers “colluded” with social workers, according to an MP’s extraordinary allegation in Parliament”

” In a highly unusual accusation, John Hemming said lawyers for Jacque Courtnage colluded with Derbyshire County Council to prevent her analysing a document he believes would have cleared her of abuse allegations.
She and her husband have lost their two sons, now aged six and eight, for ever after a court ruled on the balance of probabilities they were responsible for harming their youngest when he was a baby.

They have never been arrested nor charged with any criminal offence due to lack of evidence.

Their heartbreaking story emerged in a Commons debate two months ago when Mr Hemming used Parliamentary privilege to name the mother and to make accusations against her lawyers and Derbyshire County Council.

He says the parents are the victims of a miscarriage of justice in the secret family court system.

The Lib Dem MP believes lawyers representing families on legal aid have a conflict of interest if they also do work for local authorities.

Mrs Courtnage, a 45-year-old accountant and her husband John, 47, an engineer, only discovered the potentially significant evidence nine months after a judge ruled their children should be taken from them.

They found it among their son’s medical records, which they secured after making a request to his hospital under the Data Protection Act as part of their own probe to discover the “truth”.

The evidence was an alternative diagnosis from a leading hospital consultant saying their son’s head injury had been caused by a fissure, a birth defect that weakened the skull bone.

Until then, Mr Hemming said, they had only been aware of the fracture diagnosis put forward by other experts and used by the council in its arguments before the court.

The children are now with an adoptive family and banned from any contact with their real parents.

Mrs Courtnage, who is not allowed to talk to the media about her case, told Mr Hemming: “Our children are our very existence and without them with us and being unable to touch them is like a living hell. Just talking about our boys reduces us to tears.

“The saying of a living bereavement is very apt and one we live daily. We have no grave to mourn at.”

“We are angry at what has been done to us but words cannot begin to describe the contempt we have for what this has done to our darling sons.”

The couple’s “living hell” started in 2008 when Mrs Courtnage became concerned by a swelling on her baby boy’s head. She took him to the Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham where medics debated the X-ray results.
While two consultants made separate diagnoses of a fissure, others argued a fracture, a conclusion eventually accepted as the official version.

The diagnoses, together with evidence suggesting leg injuries to the child, were sent to Derbyshire County Council which then gave them to Mrs Courtnage’s lawyer.

However, Mr Hemming said the fissure argument was never highlighted to Mrs Courtnage and she did not see it among the 500 other documents in the large court bundles.

He told the Commons in September: “I have for some time been worried about what I was told by a social worker some years ago, which is that at times the legal aid-funded solicitors for parents conspire with local authority staff in order to ensure that the parents lose.

“One example where that appears to have happened is that of Jacque  and John Courtnage, whose two sons were taken into care because one had a lump on his head.

The doctors were not sure whether it was because of a fracture or a fissure.”

” The child was neurologically sound, which implies a fissure, but the parents did not see the evidence that it could have been a fissure until after the court had decided in 2010 that it was a fracture, and the question was never considered in any court judgment.

“A court order on October 30, 2008, had said that all evidence should be provided to the parents. That did not happen.
“The hospital provided Derbyshire County Council with the information in December 2008 but this did not get to the parents until after the finding of fact hearing of 2010, when they made a subject access request.
“The question is whether the council colluded with the parents’ solicitors.”

The MP said in the debate that he and Mrs Courtnage had asked the solicitors about the issue. He said a solicitor had denied the allegation but refused to give a “detailed response”.
He said in the Commons that, to him, meant the lawyers “colluded with Derbyshire County Council to keep this evidence from the parents”.

Mrs Courtnage tried to raise the fissure diagnosis before an appeal judge in September 2011.
However, due to an administrative mistake by court officials, the case was heard in her absence and the potentially vital pieces of paper were never presented to the judge.

She has recently decided to try to reopen the appeal under civil procedure rules.

A spokesman for Derbyshire County Council said: “We would strenuously reject any suggestion of collusion.
“The judge had before him all the child’s medical records including all those received from the Queen’s Medical Centre and the issue as to whether the child had a fissure or a fracture was fully brought before the court.

“The court had evidence from experts including a consultant paediatric radiologist and consultant neuroradiologist.
These experts were appointed independently by the solicitor acting on behalf of the child.

The child also had the benefit of a children’s guardian appointed by the court to represent his best interests.
“We are confident that the actions we took were the right ones and that the decision taken by the court was the right one.”

It’s about bloody time the disgusting scandal of Britain’s stolen children was fully investigated by the police.

If children are being snatched illegally, the social workers, lawyers and judges who were complicit in these cases should all be sacked and put on trial.

They may well end up on the receiving end of filthy Britain’s justice system themselves.

They bloody well deserve it.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/442241/Legal-aid-lawyer-secret-court-and-social-workers-colluded-to-adopt-boys

Globalists Cost British Families £16,998 In 2012

Written by Cigpapers

Photos and captions by Watt Tyler

People are always complaining about the Globalist/multiculturalist Government – but what difference would a truly Nationalist Government make? Well apart from no mass immigration, and other positive effects, let’s look at what a Nationalist Government wouldn’t waste taxpayers money on. I have calculated on a UK population of 60 million – I know it is bigger, but as the rest are illegal they won’t be paying anything anyway. So what did they waste taxpayers money on in 2012?

DONNAY

What Did The Globalist/multiculturalist Government Waste Cost A British Family Of Four In 2012?

1. European Union Membership:

In 2012 our membership of the European Union cost £118billion in fees and other financial costs associated with membership.

That is about £1,970 plus interest per person every year.

Cost for a family of four: About £7,880  plus interest

The Nationalist Alternative : Leave the European Union – the only possible advantage is the trade agreements which are legally protected if we leave anyway.

Time for Britain to break free?

Time for Britain to break free?

2. The Tax Credit Swindle:

Outlined here  https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/08/16/the-tax-credit-swindle-global-greed-inc-as-usual/

The Tax Credit Swindle costs £30 billion which is £500 per person every year plus interest.

Cost for a family of four: £2,000 plus interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : A decent minimum wage – let Tesco and Starbucks pay their own staff.

Big business gets £30billion per year in subsidies via the Tax Credit Swindle - no wonder they're lovin' it.

Big business got £30billion in 2012 in subsidies via the Tax Credit Swindle – no wonder they’re lovin’ it.

3. The PFI Fraud:

Outlined here https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/the-private-finance-initiative-pfi-fraud/

The PFI fraud costs about £150 per person every year plus further interest.

Cost for a family of four: £600 plus interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : Cancel the fraudulent debt, throw the fraudsters in prison and keep the buildings.

Gordon Brown signed the PFI fraud deals.

Gordon Brown signed the PFI fraud deals.

4. The Big Windmill Rip Off:

Outlined here https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/08/28/the-big-windmill-rip-off-revealed/

The Big Windmill Rip Off costs about £112 plus interest per family of four every year, but is set to rise steeply.

Cost for a family of four: £112 plus interest.

The Nationalist AlternativeCancel the rip off subsidised deals. Insulate houses to a very high standard and help to replace old boilers with new super efficient ones. There would be costs for a year or two then massive savings in energy use and therefore bills. Also this would be environmentally friendly – not just look “green”.

The Windmill Rip Off has a great green cover story but cost each British family £112 in 2012.

The Windmill Rip Off has a great green cover story but cost each British family £112 in 2012.

5. Foreign Aid:

In 2012 it is estimated the UK wasted about £9billion on foreign aid. Hundreds of millions goes to consultancy firms linked to the Politicians who make the payments. We also fund projects such as Local TV Stations in countries such as Iceland, Barbados ( higher per person income than Portugal ) , Turkey and Brazil.

That’s £150 per person plus interest.

Cost for a family of four: £600 plus interest

The Nationalist Alternative : Cancel foreign aid spending.

21092011576[1]

6. The Olympic Games:

Cost was £9 to 12 billion depending on estimates. This is £150 to £200 per person. We’ll average that at £175.

The Olympic secret tax haven cost another £600million+ . At least £10 per person. Secret tax haven details here https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/the-secret-olympic-corporate-tax-haven-exposed/

Cost for a family of four : £740 plus interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : Let Paris hold it – apart from the elite we all watched it on TV.

London or Paris? I watched it on TV anyway.

London or Paris? I watched it on TV anyway.

7. Illegal Foreign Wars And Occupation :

There are a lot of figures flying around, we’ve decided to go for £5billion in 2012 which looks a believable amount.

That’s about £83 per person.

Costs for a family of four : Approx. £330 plus interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : Bring the troops home and prosecute the war criminals.

DONNAY

8. Mass Immigration :

The worst part of mass immigration is the child sex slave trafficking, racism , violence, fraud and murder. Also mass immigration holds down wages and pushes up living costs. Immigration costs taxpayers a further estimated £15billion in 2012  – please feel free to debate this figure.

That’s £250 per person.

Costs for a family of four : Approx. £1000 plus interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : Stop mass immigration and start deporting illegals. Also consider whether Blair’s mass immigration and ethnic cleansing was legal.

Mass immigration is dangerous and expensive.

Mass immigration is dangerous and expensive.

9. Interest On Fraudulent National Debt :

You probably realise we allegedly have £1,377.4 billion in National Debt. This is nearly entirely fraudulent and falsely created by our corrupt Politicians at the behest of their real paymasters. This cost about £40 billion in interest alone in 2012.

That is about £667 per person plus further interest.

Costs for a family of four : Approx. £2,668 plus further interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : Stop paying and cancel the fraudulent National Debt, then throw the corrupt politicians and bankers in prison.

Not under a real Nationalist Government.

Not under a real Nationalist Government.

10. Global Corporations Offshoring Profits To Avoid Tax :

Global Corporations such as Amazon, Starbucks , Ebay etc. offshore their profits to lower tax regimes abroad by using “Royalty” deals. The figures for 2012 for this scheme are £7 to £25 billion, so we’ll average that out at a credible £16 billion.

That is about £267 per person plus further interest.

Costs for a family of four : Approx. £1,068 plus further interest.

The Nationalist Alternative : Make these Corporations pay UK taxes on UK profits.

We all have to pay UK taxes on UK earnings so why shouldn't the Global Corporations?

We all have to pay UK taxes on UK earnings so why shouldn’t the big Global Corporations?

2012 TOTAL FOR FAMILY OF FOUR : £16,998 PLUS INTEREST

You may want to dispute some of the numbers on here or add other spending items – feel free to do so. I can appreciate the costs of foreign wars and mass immigration will be hotly disputed – I had to go for a guesstimate based on a few figures. However this is just a quick list I did of things a Nationalist Government could do differently. Why not do your own list with spending decisions and amounts?